Capital Gains Tax Changes Uk

Introduction: The Changing Landscape of UK Capital Gains Taxation

The United Kingdom’s capital gains tax (CGT) framework has undergone significant structural modifications in recent years, presenting both challenges and opportunities for individual investors and corporate entities alike. These alterations to the fiscal architecture represent substantive shifts in how investment profits are taxed, potentially influencing investment strategies across various asset classes. The capital gains tax regime in the UK continues to be a critical consideration for those engaged in property transactions, equity disposals, cryptocurrency trading, and business asset sales. Recent and forthcoming adjustments to rates, allowances, and exemptions necessitate a thorough comprehension of the current tax landscape to ensure compliance while optimizing tax efficiency within the boundaries of established law. Tax planning has consequently assumed heightened importance for UK residents and non-residents with UK assets, as strategic decisions about the timing and structure of disposals can markedly impact tax liabilities. This comprehensive analysis explores the latest developments in the UK’s capital gains tax framework, examining the implications for individual and corporate taxpayers while highlighting potential tax planning opportunities.

Historical Context: The Evolution of Capital Gains Tax in the UK

The UK’s approach to taxing capital gains has undergone substantial transformation since its formal introduction in 1965. Initially conceived as a measure to tax short-term speculative gains, the system has evolved into a comprehensive framework addressing various forms of asset appreciation. Prior to 2008, the UK operated a taper relief system that reduced tax liability based on the holding period of assets, which was particularly favorable for business assets. The subsequent introduction of a flat rate represented a fundamental shift in taxation philosophy. More recently, the differential between income tax and CGT rates has narrowed, reflecting policy objectives aimed at reducing tax-motivated income shifting. The 2010 emergency budget marked another significant juncture, establishing a higher rate of 28% for higher-rate taxpayers while maintaining a lower rate for basic-rate taxpayers. The implementation of the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) in 2013 and subsequent changes to non-resident CGT rules have further shaped the system. This historical progression provides essential context for understanding the current framework and anticipating future directions in UK capital gains taxation policy as outlined by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

Current Capital Gains Tax Rates and Thresholds

The prevailing capital gains tax rates in the UK operate on a multi-tiered structure dependent on both the taxpayer’s income band and the nature of the disposed asset. For the 2023/24 tax year, basic rate taxpayers face a 10% CGT rate on most assets, escalating to 18% specifically for residential property disposals. Higher and additional rate taxpayers encounter more substantial rates: 20% for general assets and 28% for residential property. The Annual Exempt Amount (AEA) has witnessed a notable reduction, decreasing from £12,300 in 2022/23 to £6,000 in 2023/24, with a further planned reduction to £3,000 for the 2024/25 tax year. This substantial diminution of the tax-free allowance significantly amplifies the tax burden on modest gains, particularly affecting small-scale investors and those with diversified portfolios. The Business Asset Disposal Relief (formerly Entrepreneurs’ Relief) continues to offer a reduced 10% rate on qualifying disposals, albeit with a lifetime limit of £1 million, substantially decreased from the previous £10 million threshold. These parameters establish the foundational framework within which UK taxpayers must calculate their capital gains tax liabilities, necessitating diligent record-keeping of acquisition costs, enhancement expenditures, and disposal proceeds to determine taxable gains accurately. For international businesses exploring UK company formation, understanding these rates is essential for effective tax planning.

Impact on Residential Property Investors

The property investment landscape in the UK has been particularly affected by recent capital gains tax modifications. The 30-day reporting and payment requirement (subsequently extended to 60 days) for residential property disposals has imposed stringent compliance obligations on property investors, necessitating prompt valuation, calculation, and tax remittance processes. This accelerated payment schedule represents a substantial deviation from the previous system, where tax was settled through the annual self-assessment process. Concurrently, the reduction in the Annual Exempt Amount amplifies the tax burden on property disposals, potentially eroding investment returns. Non-resident property investors have witnessed an expansion of the UK tax net, with all UK property now falling within the scope of CGT regardless of use, eliminating previous exemptions for commercial property. The interaction between CGT and other property taxes, including Stamp Duty Land Tax and the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings, creates a complex tax matrix requiring careful navigation. Private residence relief remains a vital tax exemption, though recent restrictions to the final period exemption (reduced from 36 months to 9 months) and lettings relief have curtailed its scope. Property investment companies structured as UK limited companies face distinct considerations, as they are subject to Corporation Tax on chargeable gains rather than CGT, potentially offering advantages depending on the specific circumstances and corporate structure.

Business Asset Disposal Relief: Changes and Limitations

The transformation of Entrepreneurs’ Relief into Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) in March 2020 represented more than a cosmetic name change, introducing substantial limitations to this valuable tax concession. The lifetime limit reduction from £10 million to £1 million signifies a fundamental recalibration of tax benefits available to business owners upon disposal. This 90% reduction has profound implications for entrepreneurs with substantial business interests, potentially influencing exit strategies and succession planning. The qualifying conditions for BADR remain stringent, requiring a minimum 5% shareholding in a trading company, director or employee status, and a holding period of at least 24 months prior to disposal. Associated disposals of assets used in the business continue to qualify under specific conditions, providing planning opportunities for business premises. The interaction between BADR and other reliefs, such as Holdover Relief and Replacement of Business Assets Relief (formerly Rollover Relief), creates a complex framework requiring strategic tax planning. Family business transfers and management buyouts necessitate particular attention to BADR requirements to ensure qualification. For businesses operating through the UK company incorporation structure, these changes may significantly impact exit planning and valuation considerations, potentially necessitating revised business disposal strategies to optimize tax outcomes within the new constraints.

Changes to Reporting and Payment Deadlines

The procedural framework for capital gains tax compliance has undergone substantive reform, with the introduction of accelerated reporting and payment requirements representing a paradigm shift in tax administration. The UK Property Reporting Service now mandates UK residents to report and pay CGT on residential property disposals within 60 days of completion (extended from the initial 30-day window introduced in April 2020). This accelerated timeline creates significant compliance challenges, particularly for complex transactions involving multiple reliefs or valuations. For non-UK residents, the reporting obligation extends to all UK property disposals, both residential and commercial, maintaining the 60-day deadline irrespective of whether a gain arises, though exemptions apply in specified circumstances. The UK’s implementation of digital reporting represents alignment with international trends toward real-time tax reporting, as seen in various jurisdictions globally. The practical implications include increased administrative burdens, cash flow considerations due to accelerated payment requirements, and the necessity for prompt professional advice following property disposals. These reporting changes operate alongside the traditional self-assessment system, with property disposals requiring dual reporting in many cases, first through the dedicated property service and subsequently via the annual tax return. Penalties for non-compliance with these deadlines commence at £100 for late filing, escalating substantially for extended delays, underscoring the importance of timely reporting. Business entities operating through UK company registrations must be particularly vigilant about these reporting requirements to avoid penalties and interest charges.

International Considerations and Non-Resident CGT

The UK’s capital gains tax regime has progressively expanded its territorial scope, creating significant implications for international investors and non-UK residents with British assets. The Non-Resident Capital Gains Tax (NRCGT) framework, initially applied to residential property in 2015, was extended to commercial property and indirect property interests from April 2019. This extension eliminated a long-standing exemption that had made the UK an attractive location for international property investment. The rebasing provisions as of April 2015 for residential property and April 2019 for commercial property provide partial protection for historic gains, though record-keeping requirements remain substantial. The computation methodology for non-resident gains incorporates specific rules regarding allowable deductions, currency conversion, and loss utilization. Double taxation considerations assume particular importance for international investors, with the UK’s extensive treaty network offering potential relief mechanisms, though the specific provisions vary significantly between jurisdictions. Compliance obligations for non-residents include the 60-day reporting requirement through the NRCGT return system, operating independently of any self-assessment obligations. The interaction between NRCGT and corporate structures, particularly regarding the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings and the substantial shareholding exemption, creates a complex matrix requiring specialized advice. For international entrepreneurs seeking to set up a UK limited company, these non-resident CGT provisions necessitate careful consideration in the overall investment structure.

Crypto Assets and Digital Investments Taxation

The taxation of cryptocurrency and digital assets has emerged as a focal point within the UK’s capital gains framework, with HMRC adopting increasingly defined positions on these novel asset classes. The tax authority’s definitive classification of crypto assets as property for tax purposes subjects them fully to capital gains tax provisions, creating substantial record-keeping requirements in a notoriously volatile market. The "same day" and "30-day" pooling rules applicable to traditional securities now extend to cryptocurrency transactions, creating complex calculation requirements for active traders. The determination of allowable costs incorporates acquisition expenses, wallet fees, and specific mining-related expenditures under prescribed conditions. HMRC’s position on hard forks, airdrops, and staking rewards introduces further complexity, with potential differences in treatment between passive receipt and active participation. The situs (location) of crypto assets for non-resident taxation purposes remains an evolving area, though HMRC generally adopts the position that tokens are located where the beneficial owner is resident. Record-keeping assumes critical importance given the transaction volume typically associated with crypto trading, with the burden of proof regarding cost basis falling to the taxpayer. For businesses operating in the digital asset space through UK company structures, the distinction between trading and investment activities becomes particularly significant, as it determines whether profits fall under income tax or CGT provisions, with different rates and allowances applicable.

Share Disposals and Enterprise Investment Scheme Considerations

The taxation of share disposals incorporates numerous specialized provisions, particularly regarding qualifying business investments and venture capital schemes. The Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) offers substantial tax incentives, including CGT deferral on investments and potential exemption from CGT on disposal of qualifying shares held for at least three years. Similar benefits apply to Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) investments, though with different thresholds and conditions. The interaction between these reliefs and Business Asset Disposal Relief creates planning opportunities for investors and entrepreneurs alike. Share identification rules for determining acquisition costs (the share pooling rules) introduce computational complexity, particularly for investors with multiple acquisitions over extended periods. The substantial shareholding exemption for corporate entities provides potential exemption from corporation tax on chargeable gains, subject to specific trading and ownership conditions. The gift hold-over relief for unquoted trading company shares enables potential deferral of gains on gifted shares, facilitating family succession planning. For non-UK domiciled individuals, the remittance basis of taxation may offer planning opportunities regarding foreign shares, though recent restrictions have limited these advantages. Shareholders contemplating issuing new shares in a UK limited company must consider these provisions carefully to optimize their tax position on eventual disposal.

Principal Private Residence Relief: Reduced Final Period Exemption

The cornerstone of UK capital gains tax planning for residential property, Principal Private Residence (PPR) Relief, has undergone significant restriction in recent years, impacting homeowners with multiple properties or extended periods of absence. The final period exemption reduction from 36 months to 9 months (implemented from April 2020) substantially narrows the tax-exempt window following vacating a property, particularly affecting those experiencing delays in property sales or with overlapping ownership periods. The constriction of lettings relief to situations where the owner shares occupancy with the tenant eliminates a previously valuable relief for those who let former homes. The nomination requirements for designated main residences assume heightened importance given these restrictions, with the default position potentially creating adverse tax consequences in the absence of formal election. Absence provisions continue to provide protection during specific circumstances, including employment assignments, though strict conditions apply regarding resumption of residence. The interaction between PPR and other reliefs, including Replacement of Domestic Residence Relief (formerly known as PPR letting relief), creates planning opportunities that require careful consideration of timing and qualification criteria. For international assignees and those with properties in multiple jurisdictions, the PPR rules interact with residency status determinations and potentially with overseas property relief provisions under applicable tax treaties. These modifications to PPR relief have particular significance for property investors utilizing UK company formations for non-residents, as corporate structures generally cannot access PPR relief.

Offshore Structures and Anti-Avoidance Provisions

The UK tax authorities have implemented increasingly robust anti-avoidance measures targeting offshore structures used to mitigate capital gains tax liabilities. The Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) regime and associated ATED-related capital gains tax provisions apply specific rules to high-value residential properties held through corporate envelopes, with punitive rates and reporting requirements. The expansion of the non-resident CGT rules to indirect disposals captures gains on shares in property-rich entities, effectively preventing circumvention of property taxation through corporate layering. The Transactions in Land legislation targets development gains artificially structured as capital gains, potentially recharacterizing them as trading income subject to higher tax rates. Trust structures face particular scrutiny, with specific anti-avoidance provisions targeting both UK-resident settlements and offshore trusts with UK connections. The disclosure of tax avoidance schemes (DOTAS) regulations impose reporting obligations on arrangements with hallmarks of avoidance, with significant penalties for non-compliance. The incorporation of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiatives into UK domestic law has further strengthened anti-avoidance provisions regarding corporate structures and international arrangements. The General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR) provides broad powers to counteract tax advantages arising from abusive arrangements, creating uncertainty for aggressive planning structures. For businesses considering offshore company registration with UK connections, these anti-avoidance provisions necessitate particularly careful planning and professional guidance.

Loss Relief Strategies and Opportunities

Strategic utilization of capital losses represents a critical element of effective tax planning within the UK capital gains framework. The fundamental principle that capital losses must be set against capital gains in the same tax year before applying the Annual Exempt Amount creates planning imperatives regarding the timing of disposals. Loss carry-forward provisions enable indefinite utilization of unrelieved losses in subsequent tax years, though specific claim procedures must be followed to preserve this valuable tax attribute. The restriction on loss claims for connected party transactions prevents artificial crystallization of losses while retaining economic ownership, though genuine commercial disposals remain eligible for relief. The interaction between different types of losses – including shares becoming of negligible value, loans to traders, and physical asset disposals – creates planning opportunities through selective crystallization. The special provisions for losses on qualifying EIS and SEIS investments potentially allow offset against income rather than capital gains, providing enhanced tax value in appropriate circumstances. Losses arising from disposals by non-residents face specific restrictions regarding utilization against UK gains only, limiting their value for international investors. Corporate entities face distinct considerations regarding loss utilization, with potential interaction between capital losses and the corporate loss restriction provisions. For businesses operating through UK company structures, these loss relief provisions form a crucial element of tax-efficient investment management and disposal strategy.

Gift Hold-Over Relief and Family Succession Planning

Family business succession planning benefits from specific capital gains tax reliefs designed to facilitate intergenerational transfer without triggering immediate tax liabilities. Gift Hold-Over Relief enables potential deferral of capital gains on business assets and certain unquoted shares when transferred by way of gift, effectively passing the latent tax liability to the recipient through a base cost adjustment. The conditions for qualification include specific requirements regarding trading status, with investment activities potentially jeopardizing eligibility. The interaction between Hold-Over Relief and other business reliefs, particularly Business Asset Disposal Relief, creates planning opportunities for phased succession arrangements. The treatment of associated disposals, particularly business premises used in family operations, requires careful structuring to maintain relief eligibility. Trust structures continue to offer planning advantages for family succession, though anti-avoidance provisions necessitate careful consideration of settlor and beneficiary relationships. The distinction between outright gifts and sales at undervalue assumes particular importance, as partial consideration potentially restricts hold-over claims proportionately. The interaction with inheritance tax reliefs, particularly Business Property Relief, creates opportunities for integrated lifetime and death tax planning for family businesses. For international families utilizing UK company structures for global operations, the interplay between UK hold-over provisions and overseas tax regimes necessitates coordinated cross-border advice to optimize succession arrangements.

Retirement Relief and Age-Related Considerations

While Retirement Relief was abolished and replaced by Entrepreneurs’ Relief (now Business Asset Disposal Relief), age-related considerations remain relevant within the capital gains tax framework, particularly regarding retirement planning and later-life asset disposals. The transitional provisions for pre-2003 gains continue to provide grandfathered relief in specific circumstances, though with diminishing practical significance due to the passage of time. The interaction between pension drawdown strategies and capital gains tax planning assumes particular importance for retirees with substantial investment portfolios, as coordinated planning regarding income levels and CGT thresholds can produce material tax efficiencies. The availability of the residential nil-rate band for inheritance tax creates planning opportunities regarding the retention or disposal of properties in later life, with CGT considerations forming one element of the broader analysis. The reduced Annual Exempt Amount has particular significance for retirees relying on regular investment disposals to supplement pension income, potentially necessitating revised withdrawal strategies. Care fee planning introduces additional complexity, with the interaction between capital gains tax on disposals and means-testing considerations for support eligibility. For business owners approaching retirement, the interaction between pension contributions, Business Asset Disposal Relief, and potential reinvestment into EIS qualifying investments creates sophisticated planning opportunities to manage tax across different regimes. These considerations are particularly relevant for entrepreneurs utilizing UK company structures as they approach retirement and exit planning phases.

Rebasing and Valuation Challenges

Determining accurate market valuations represents a fundamental challenge within the capital gains tax framework, particularly for assets without readily accessible market prices or those subject to specific rebasing provisions. The rebasing of assets to March 1982 values continues to apply for assets held before this date, though with diminishing practical significance as the proportion of such long-held assets declines. The specific rebasing provisions for non-resident property owners (to April 2015 for residential property and April 2019 for commercial property) create valuation requirements at these specific dates to establish the relevant acquisition cost for CGT purposes. The valuation of unquoted shares and business interests presents particular challenges, with HMRC potentially scrutinizing valuations based on earnings multiples, asset values, and comparable transactions. The acceptance of valuations by HMRC remains discretionary, with the Shares and Assets Valuation office potentially challenging submissions through formal correspondence procedures. The rebasing election available to previously non-domiciled individuals who became deemed domiciled in the UK from April 2017 offers potential tax advantages, though with complex conditions regarding remittance basis usage and specific procedural requirements. The valuation of digital assets, particularly unique NFTs and illiquid cryptocurrencies, presents novel challenges requiring specialized expertise. For businesses structured through UK company formations, these valuation considerations have particular relevance for share transfers, reorganizations, and eventual disposal planning.

Implications for Corporate Reorganizations and Reconstructions

Corporate restructuring transactions interact with capital gains provisions in complex ways, with specific reliefs available to prevent tax charges arising from commercial reorganizations that lack disposal substance. The Substantial Shareholding Exemption (SSE) provides potential exemption from corporation tax on chargeable gains for qualifying disposals of trading subsidiaries, subject to specific trading status and ownership conditions before and after disposal. The reorganization provisions under section 135 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 enable tax-neutral share exchanges and corporate reconstructions, deferring potential gains until subsequent disposals outside these provisions. The incorporation relief provisions facilitate the transfer of businesses into corporate structures without crystallizing gains on goodwill and other business assets, creating a latent tax liability through base cost adjustment. The demerger provisions enable the separation of business activities into distinct corporate entities, potentially qualifying for tax-neutral treatment under specific conditions regarding distribution and subsequent ownership. These provisions assume particular importance for group simplification, pre-sale restructuring, and family business divisions. The interaction with stamp taxes, particularly Stamp Duty Land Tax on property transfers within reorganizations, requires coordinated planning to manage the overall tax burden. For businesses considering UK company structures as part of international reorganizations, these provisions require careful consideration alongside equivalent foreign provisions to ensure tax efficiency across jurisdictions.

Comparison with International CGT Regimes

The UK’s approach to capital gains taxation exists within a diverse international landscape of capital taxation methodologies, with significant variations in rates, exemptions, and computational approaches across major economies. The UK’s dual-rate system based on income levels differs from jurisdictions like the United States, which applies differential rates based primarily on holding periods through preferential long-term capital gains rates. The UK’s reduction of the Annual Exempt Amount contrasts with approaches in countries like Australia, which maintains inflation indexation mechanisms for certain assets. The complete exemption of capital gains in jurisdictions like Singapore and Malaysia for most asset classes represents a fundamentally different philosophical approach to capital taxation. The UK’s approach to taxing non-residents on property gains aligns with increasing international trends toward source-based taxation, though methodological differences exist regarding indirect holdings and reporting mechanisms. The UK’s treatment of cryptocurrency broadly aligns with approaches in major economies, though with significant variations in specific computational methodologies and reporting requirements. The corporate taxation of capital gains varies substantially, with the UK’s approach of taxing corporate gains through the corporation tax system contrasting with separate capital gains tax systems for corporations in some jurisdictions. For international businesses considering various jurisdictions for operations, including company formation in Ireland or LLC creation in the USA, these comparative capital gains considerations play an important role in jurisdiction selection and investment structuring.

Future Trends and Potential Changes

The evolving nature of the UK’s capital gains tax framework suggests potential future adjustments based on fiscal necessities, policy objectives, and international tax developments. Speculation regarding potential rate harmonization with income tax has persisted following the Office of Tax Simplification’s 2020 review, which proposed closer alignment between income and capital taxation to reduce incentives for recharacterizing income as capital. The decreasing Annual Exempt Amount may face further reduction or potential elimination as the government seeks to broaden the tax base while maintaining headline rates. The international trend toward digital reporting and accelerated tax collection suggests potential expansion of real-time CGT reporting beyond property transactions, potentially creating additional compliance obligations for other asset disposals. The increasing focus on wealth inequality may drive policy consideration of wealth taxation mechanisms, with potential implications for asset valuation and capital gains realization events. The specific reliefs for business assets, including Business Asset Disposal Relief, remain subject to potential further restriction as fiscal pressures intensify. The treatment of emerging asset classes, particularly in the digital realm, will likely see continued regulatory and tax policy development as these markets mature. The interaction with international tax initiatives, particularly regarding minimum effective taxation under OECD Pillar Two provisions, may influence domestic capital gains policies for corporate entities. These potential developments have particular relevance for businesses utilizing UK company structures for international operations, necessitating ongoing monitoring of policy developments and potential advance planning for announced changes.

Planning Strategies for Individuals and Businesses

Effective capital gains tax planning incorporates both structural considerations and transactional timing within the established legal framework to optimize tax outcomes while ensuring full compliance with statutory obligations. Annual Exemption utilization assumes heightened importance following the threshold reduction, with potential benefit from staggered disposals across tax years to maximize available exemptions. The strategic use of spousal transfers to utilize dual annual exemptions and potentially lower rate bands offers legitimate planning opportunities, particularly for jointly owned assets. The timing of disposals to coincide with periods of lower income potentially reduces applicable CGT rates for higher earners through rate band management. Loss harvesting strategies, involving the selective crystallization of latent losses to offset realized gains, provide potential tax efficiency while maintaining desired economic exposure through alternative investments. The election for the remittance basis of taxation continues to offer planning opportunities for non-UK domiciled individuals, though with the substantial remittance basis charge for long-term residents. The identification of qualifying business assets for potential Business Asset Disposal Relief claims requires proactive planning and potential corporate structure adjustment to fulfill qualifying conditions. The evaluation of available reliefs for land developments, including strategic phasing of transactions and potential joint venture structures, may optimize the tax treatment of development gains. For business owners utilizing UK company structures, the comparative analysis of asset sales versus share sales, considering purchaser preferences and available reliefs, forms an essential element of exit planning.

Compliance Considerations and Record-Keeping Requirements

The administrative framework surrounding capital gains tax creates substantial compliance obligations, with stringent record-keeping requirements and potential penalties for non-adherence to procedural requirements. The 60-day reporting window for UK property disposals necessitates prompt collation of acquisition details, enhancement expenditures, and disposal proceeds to facilitate accurate calculation and timely submission. The self-assessment integration of capital gains reporting requires comprehensive inclusion of all taxable disposals, with specific additional schedules for certain transaction types including residential property, carried interest, and non-resident disposals. The statutory requirement to maintain records for at least five years from the relevant filing deadline (extended to six years for non-residents) imposes substantial documentation obligations, particularly challenging for long-held assets with historical enhancement expenditures. The penalty regime for non-compliance incorporates both fixed penalties for late filing and tax-geared penalties for inaccuracies, with potential mitigation through voluntary disclosure and cooperating with HMRC inquiries. The distinction between avoidance and evasion assumes critical importance, with the former representing legitimate planning within the legislative framework and the latter constituting criminal activity with potential prosecution consequences. The advance clearance procedures available for certain transactions, particularly corporate reconstructions, provide potential certainty regarding tax treatment before implementation. For businesses utilizing UK company structures, the interaction between corporate compliance obligations and individual shareholder reporting creates a complex matrix requiring coordinated professional advice.

Navigating the UK Capital Gains Tax Landscape: Expert Assistance

The increasing complexity of the UK capital gains tax framework, coupled with ongoing legislative changes and enhanced enforcement focus, underscores the critical importance of expert professional guidance in this specialized domain. The interplay between various reliefs, exemptions, and computational rules creates a multifaceted tax landscape requiring both technical expertise and practical experience to navigate effectively. Strategic decisions regarding asset structuring, disposal timing, and relief claims can produce materially different tax outcomes, with the potential for significant tax efficiency through proper planning within the legislative framework.

If you’re seeking expert guidance on UK capital gains tax matters, whether as an individual investor, business owner, or corporate entity, we invite you to book a personalized consultation with our specialized team at Ltd24.co.uk. We are an international tax consulting boutique with advanced expertise in corporate law, tax risk management, wealth protection, and international audits. We offer tailored solutions for entrepreneurs, professionals, and corporate groups operating on a global scale.

Schedule a session with one of our experts now for $199 USD/hour and receive concrete answers to your tax and corporate questions. Our advisors can help you navigate the complexities of capital gains taxation while identifying legitimate planning opportunities to optimize your tax position. Book your consultation today and ensure your capital gains tax strategy is both compliant and efficient in the current fiscal environment.